Wednesday, October 22nd, 2014

The New York Law Journal Reviews Final Verdict

February 24, 2011 by  

New York Law Journal, Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Final Verdict: What Really Happened In the Rosenberg Case

Reviewed by Walter Barthold

Time, we are told, heals all wounds. It has not done so in the case of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. Well over a half century has gone by since the matter supposedly came to an end. Yet the trial and execution of the Rosenbergs still haunt the American conscience. In “Final Verdict,” Walter Schneir, who died last year, has added another volume to the library of books on the subject. His effort to straighten out the facts of the case deserves serious consideration. [more]

Harry Gold in Jewish Journal

February 1, 2011 by  

After “The Jewish Journal” gave a favorable review to Allen M. Hornblum’s new biography of Harry Gold, Michael Meeropol offered this response, which delves into the latest research on the case.

Final Verdict in NY Times

February 1, 2011 by  

Final Verdict: What Really Happened in the Rosenberg Case by Walter Schneir edited by Miriam Schneir, was reviewed on October 24, 2010 by Sam Roberts in the Sunday New York Times Book Review. Click here for the review (registration may be required).

Exoneration in Jewish Journal

February 1, 2011 by  

Exoneration by Dave and Emily Alman was reviewed on November 6, 2010 by Jonathan Kirsch in the JewishJournal.com. Here’s the link.

Final Verdict: What Really Happened in the Rosenberg Case

February 1, 2011 by  

Ronald Radosh and Steven Usdin reviewed Final Verdict: What Really Happened in the Rosenberg Case for the New Republic. The review can be found here. Michael Meeropol wrote a letter to the magazine, responding to the review. The editors declined to publish it. You can read it here, however.

In Response to Ronald Radosh and Steven Usdin

February 1, 2011 by  

Below is the letter by Michael Meeropol that The New Republic declined to publish:

TO THE EDITOR OF THE NEW REPUBLIC

In the course of a non-review of Final Verdict by the late Walter Schneir, Ronald Radosh and Steven Usdin make a number of assertions that do not stand up to the historical record. With limited space, I can only deal with one of them. [more]